不是所有人都有天赋、能去解决“千禧年大奖难题”,但也不是所有能解决的人都要选择放弃好好生活去解一个数学难题。
天才在成为天才之前,都是作为普通人出生的(喜欢医院那场戏)。可能比喻不当,就像那瞎了一只眼的Fred,虽然在人群之中会比较特别,也不妨碍 小姑娘和她一样,拥有最简单纯粹的快乐。
How do you unwrap the gift, parents? It indeed seems no easier than the Navier-Stokes for many supports to raise a talent. Frank prefers protecting the child's psychological health and helping her growth in personality with empathy and affectionate environment to fully exploring her potential before finding a better balance between the two, while Mary's grandma insists that extraordinary people is doom to be away from the ordinary and tries to isolate children from any close relationship, which in her eyes is but distraction from success. Extraordinary doesn't mean abnormal, arrogant or alone, and doesn't necessarily lead to a happy life. A gift is a gift only when it's properly unwrapped.
很开心并没有着重讲小女孩的才能多么出色而是探讨究竟怎样对待天才儿童来帮助其成长。整体还是暖暖的,大概结果就是这个本来就不可一概而论,尊重意愿+合理引导+充分关爱才是正途
定期看看主旋律,虽然套路多到假,但是有利健康。这片子一副我们全家都是天才,但我们只想要平凡的生活,我们不要培养孩子,因为我的孩子压根不需要培养。回头看自己孩子流着哈喇子的睡相,心里恨恨的。